Erythropoietin protects against doxorubicin-induced heart failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hormone erythropoietin (EPO) has been demonstrated to have cardioprotective properties. The present study investigates the role of EPO to prevent heart failure following cancer treatment with doxorubicin [adriamycin (AD)]. Male Wistar rats (150 ± 10 g) were treated with saline (vehicle control group); with EPO, subcutaneously at 1,000 IU/kg body wt, three times per week for 4 wk (EPO group); with adriamycin, intraperitoneally at 2.5 mg/kg body wt, three times per week for 2 wk (AD group); and with adriamycin and EPO (EPO-AD group). Echocardiographic measurements showed that EPO-AD treatment prevented the AD-induced decline in cardiac function. Each of the hearts was then exposed to ischemia and reperfusion during Langendorff perfusion. The percentage of recovery after ischemia-reperfusion was significantly greater in EPO-AD than the AD-treated group for left ventricular developed pressure, maximal increase in pressure, and rate pressure product. The level of oxidative stress was significantly higher in AD (5 μM for 24 h)-exposed isolated cardiomyocytes; EPO (5 U/ml for 48 h) treatment prevented this. EPO treatment also decreased AD-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis, which was associated with the decrease in the Bax-to-Bcl2 ratio and caspase-3 activation. Immunostaining of myocardial tissue for CD31 showed a significant decrease in the number of capillaries in AD-treated animals. EPO-AD treatment restored the number of capillaries. In conclusion, EPO treatment effectively prevented AD-induced heart failure. The protective effect of EPO was associated with a decreased level of oxidative stress and apoptosis in cardiomyocytes as well as improved myocardial angiogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".