MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139640168 · doi:10.1002/chir.20527

On the origin of circular dichroism in trigonal dihedral d<sup>6</sup> complexes of bidentate ligands containing only σ‐orbitals. A qualitative model based on a density functional theory study of Λ‐[Co(en)<sub>3</sub>]<sup>3+</sup>

2008· article· en· W2139640168 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChirality · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular spectroscopy and chirality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDensity functional theoryDihedral angleAtomic orbitalCrystallographyCircular dichroismDenticityTime-dependent density functional theoryMolecular orbitalVibrational circular dichroismLigand (biochemistry)Ligand field theoryComputational chemistryChirality (physics)Molecular physicsMoleculePhysicsQuantum mechanicsSymmetry breakingCrystal structureHydrogen bondElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) in conjunction with qualitative molecular orbital theory is employed to interpret the circular dichroism (CD) spectrum of Lambda-[Co(en)(3)](3+). The simulated spectrum based on TD-DFT is compared in details with the experimental data. Emphasis is put on a qualitative understanding of the origin of optical activity in sigma-bonded trigonal dihedral complexes with bidentate ligands in general. Rotatory strengths associated with the CD bands of both d-d transitions and ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) are interpreted based on the metal-ligand sigma-interactions. These interactions are in turn analyzed in terms of symmetry unique overlaps between metal d- and symmetry ligand-orbitals as well as the dependence of these overlaps on geometrical parameters of the complex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it