MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2139706462 · doi:10.1139/p02-118

Segregation, transport, and interaction of climate proxies in polycrystalline ice

2003· article· en· W2139706462 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. W. Rempel, J. S. Wettlaufer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsIce coreSedimentary depositional environmentPaleoclimatologyDeposition (geology)ImpurityClimate changeEarth scienceGeologyPhysical geographyPhysicsPaleontologyClimatologyGeographyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The most detailed records of the Earth's climate during the past few hundred millennia are derived from ice cores retrieved from Greenland and Antarctica. The analyses of these records assume that the distributions of the trace constituents that are used as proxies for past climate have not significantly altered since deposition at the surface, and yet careful studies, at high spatial resolution, have identified core segments where appreciable post-depositional changes have occurred. To improve the reliability and resolution of paleoclimate interpretations, we have examined the mechanisms underlying the transport and interaction of climate proxies in polycrystalline ice, many of which are soluble impurities that are found principally in premelted liquid that lines the boundaries between ice grains. We find that the rate of post-depositional alteration depends critically on where the trace constituents reside; whether in the premelted liquid, in which case they exert a controlling influence on the total volume fraction of liquid that is present, or in the grains themselves. In the former case, the premelted liquid reservoir contains the principle conduits through which many of the impurities are transported and interact, and in the latter case, the temporal evolution of impurity concentration is both slower and more complex. We provide quantitative models that describe these processes and highlight the importance of impurity segregation for our understanding of past climates. PACS Nos.: 66.30Jt, 91.60Ed, 92.40Sn, 92.40Vq, 92.70-j

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→