Comparison of repair and rejoining fidelity between two isogenic human ovarian carcinoma cell lines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The difference in radiosensitivity between two isogenic tumour cell lines was evaluated to determine whether factors such as sublethal and potentially damage repair, DNA double-strand break repair and fidelity of repair can be related to differences in radiosensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cell lines used were the ovarian carcinoma A2780s and a radiation-resistant derivative A2780cp. Radiation response was measured in terms of cell survival, recovery of sublethal (SLD) and potentially lethal damage (PLD), induction of and recovery of DNA strand breaks, and fidelity of DNA repair using a cell-free plasmid assay. RESULTS: While A2780cp was more resistant to radiation than A2780s, it showed less ability for recovery of SLD and PLD. DNA strand-break induction was the same for both cell lines, while only at very high doses did A2780cp show greater DNA strand-break recovery than A2780s. Fidelity of rejoining DNA was significantly higher in the A2780cp cell line. CONCLUSION: The difference in radiosensitivity between these two cell lines was not related to recovery of PLD or SLD or to the induction of DNA damage. It appears that fidelity of DNA rejoining, which was significantly higher in the resistant cell line, may be related to the difference in radiosensitivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".