MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Muscarinic Enhancement of R-Type Calcium Currents in Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Neurons

2006· article· en· W2139797651 on OpenAlexafffund
Chun‐Hwei Tai, J. Brent Kuzmiski, Brian A. MacVicar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsMuscarinic acetylcholine receptorChemistryBiophysicsT-type calcium channelVoltage-dependent calcium channelCholinergicAcetylcholineNeuroscienceCalciumReceptorBiologyBiochemistryEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The "toxin-resistant" R-type Ca2+ channels are expressed widely in the CNS and distributed mainly in apical dendrites and spines. They play important roles in regulating signal transduction and intrinsic properties of neurons, but the modulation of these channels in the mammalian CNS has not been studied. In this study we used whole-cell patch-clamp recordings and found that muscarinic activation enhances R-type, but does not affect T-type, Ca2+ currents in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons after N, P/Q, and L-type Ca2+ currents selectively were blocked. M1/M3 cholinergic receptors mediated the muscarinic stimulation of R-type Ca2+ channels. The signaling pathway underlying the R-type enhancement was independent of intracellular [Ca2+] changes and required the activation of a Ca(2+)-independent PKC pathway. Furthermore, we found that the enhancement of R-type Ca2+ currents resulted in the de novo appearance of Ca2+ spikes and in remarkable changes in the firing pattern of R-type Ca2+ spikes, which could fire repetitively in the theta frequency. Therefore, muscarinic enhancement of R-type Ca2+ channels could play an important role in modifying the dendritic response to synaptic inputs and in the intrinsic resonance properties of neurons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207