MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139842404 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2008.053

Animal–Substrate Interactions in an Early Miocene Wave-Dominated Tropical Delta: Delineating Environmental Stresses and Depositional Dynamics (Tacata Field, Eastern Venezuela)

2008· article· en· W2139842404 on OpenAlexaff
Luís A. Buatois, Nubia Santiago, K. Parra, R. J. Steel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySedimentary depositional environmentDeltaField (mathematics)Substrate (aquarium)PaleontologyEarth scienceOceanographyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Miocene Tácata reservoirs of the Eastern Venezuela Basin contain deposits that accumulated as a result of the progradation of a wave-dominated delta complex in a tropical setting. Integration of ichnologic and sedimentologic data helps to detect different stress factors, allowing distinction between deltaic and associated along-strike strandplain shoreface successions. Fluvial discharge was repeatedly interrupted by periods of storm-wave reworking and suspension fallout, leaving diagnostic ichnologic signatures in the deposits. Repeated storms rank among the most important controlling factors on the front of the Tácata deltas. Lateral (especially on the updrift side) to the river mouths wave activity caused nearly continuous accretion of the associated strandplains. Evidence of tidal influence is essentially restricted to distributary channel and, particularly, interdistributary-bay deposits. Although elements of the Skolithos ichnofacies (e.g., Skolithos) are present, they tend to occur in subordinate numbers as a result of water turbidity. Distributary-channel deposits are sparsely bioturbated, but the presence of certain ichnotaxa (e.g., Ophiomorpha) allows distinction from freshwater fluvial channels. Ichnofabrics from interdistributary-bay deposits display all the characteristics expected from brackish-water settings (e.g., low ichnodiversity, presence of monospecific suites) and are also typically sparsely bioturbated. Teichichnus and Planolites, commonly associated with synaeresis cracks, are dominant ichnotaxa in these fine-grained, low-energy, protected brackish-water settings. In contrast, delta-front and prodelta deposits contain some ichnotaxa that typically do not occur in brackish-water settings, such as Chondrites and Phycosiphon. Preservation of very thin storm layers is probably more common in wave-dominated deltas than in strandplain systems because deltaic stresses preclude the establishment of an abundant infauna that otherwise would have completely reworked such thin sandstone layers. Amalgamated, thick-bedded storm deposits are typically unburrowed or contain deep vertical Ophiomorpha. Scolicia ichnofabrics seem to be restricted to the fully marine parts of strandplain deposits, and are therefore useful to detect possible delta asymmetry along depositional strike or vertical changes in degree of deltaic influence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207