MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139918380 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2007.4434577

An intelligent approach for supervisory control of grinding product particle size

2007· article· en· W2139918380 on OpenAlexaff
Ping Zhou, Jinliang Ding, Tianyou Chai, Hong Wang, Chun-Yi Su

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGrindingSupervisory controlIntelligent controlFuzzy control systemProcess (computing)Artificial neural networkControl systemFuzzy logicInterface (matter)Control engineeringControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grinding product particle size (GPPS) of grinding circuit (GC) is an important performance index directly related to the product concentrate grade and metal recovery rate. However, it is hard to control effectively with conventional process control strategies due to its complex characteristics. In this paper, an intelligent supervisory control (ISC) approach of GC is developed by employed intelligent techniques, such as Fuzzy and artificial neural network (ANN). This DCS-based ISC system consists of a fuzzy adjustor, an ANN-based GPPS prediction module and an expert interface, and is used to supervise the grinding system and to adjust the setpoints of lower level control loop automatically. The outputs of these loops can therefore track their renewed setpoints so that a desired and optimized GPPS can been achieved. Industrial experiments show the effectiveness of the proposed ISC approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207