MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2139954717 · doi:10.1093/mollus/70.2.165

LENGTH POLYMORPHISMS IN AN INTRON OF AMINOPEPTIDASE N PROVIDE A USEFUL NUCLEAR DNA MARKER FOR LITTORINA SPECIES (CAENOGASTROPODA)

2004· article· en· W2139954717 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Inna M. Sokolova, Elizabeth G. Boulding

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Molluscan Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicParasite Biology and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyLittorinaCaenogastropodaLocus (genetics)GeneticsIntronNuclear genePopulationGeneZoologyMitochondrial DNAGastropoda

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studies of population genetic structure and hybridization among ecotypes of Littorina require both mitochondrial and nuclear markers, yet relatively few nuclear markers have been described. We used universal PCR primers for aminopeptidase N that were originally developed for the Pacific oyster, to amplify the gene in Littorina subrotundata. Three different sized PCR products (320 bp, 460 bp and 720 bp) were obtained and identified as three different proteins containing the zinc‐binding motif HEXXHXW, characteristic of aminopeptidase N. We chose the locus with the longest intron, APN54, and designed primers in the flanking exon sequence that were specific for locus APN54 for Littorina species. The Littorina‐specific primers successfully amplified only the APN54 locus in all seven species of Littorina tested and showed considerable between‐ and within‐species polymorphism in intron sequence and length. We present data from two populations of two different species, L. subrotundata and L. sitkana, that show our new nuclear marker has two or three common alleles per locus and is therefore an especially efficient population marker for small sample sizes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Molluscan StudiesSame topicParasite Biology and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207