MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140012139 · doi:10.1109/pac.2001.986548

RF activities on cavities and turn key accelerator systems at ACCEL

2002· article· en· W2140012139 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Peiniger, M. Pekeler, Christian Piel, P. Stein, H. Vogel

Bibliographic record

VenuePACS2001. Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.01CH37268) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)SynchrotronBooster (rocketry)Radio frequencyParticle acceleratorSystems engineeringElectrical engineeringLinear particle acceleratorComputer scienceNuclear engineeringEngineeringPhysicsAerospace engineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beside the pure manufacture of normal and superconducting cavities ACCEL Instruments has continuously expanded its RF activities for worldwide customers in research and industry. Our scope includes feasibility studies on special and large scale cavity applications, review and optimisation especially on SRF modules as well as the supply of complete accelerator linacs and systems including control systems and rf supply. These projects are performed in tight co operation with leading worldwide experts, universities, and research institutes, respectively. Besides various other activities, which will be described in more detail, the most recent test results of superconducting TESLA cavities will be presented. Further the production of PEP II style cavities (476 MHz) will be described as well as the status of the fabrication of two 53 MHz copper cavities for BNL's National Synchrotron Light Source. The recent project of the 500 MHz Booster RF system for the Canadian Light Source will be introduced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePACS2001. Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.01CH37268)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207