MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140027443 · doi:10.4271/2007-01-0390

Fatigue Properties of High Pressure Die-Cast Magnesium AM60B Alloy

2007· article· en· W2140027443 on OpenAlexafffund
Yue Lu, Farid Taheri‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬, Michael A. Gharghouri

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloys Composites Properties
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersAUTO21 Network of Centres of Excellence
KeywordsDie (integrated circuit)Materials scienceMagnesium alloyAlloyMagnesiumMetallurgyDie casting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnesium castings are experiencing increased use in the transportation industry because of their high strength to weight ratio, high stiffness, and excellent castability. The casting characteristics allow complicated shapes to be cast to close tolerances with high reproducibility. As the use of magnesium castings increases, the need for research on this alloy is becomes more prevalent. Indeed, little research has been performed on magnesium alloys compared to aluminum castings. In the present study, the influence of the microstructure in a high pressure die casting AM60B magnesium auto component is investigated. Fatigue samples were removed from the component. Staircase fatigue testing was conducted first and the fracture surfaces were then examined with the scanning electron microscope. It was found that the majority of fatigue cracks initiated from sub-surface voids underneath machined surfaces, not the cast skins. Machining a specimen out of a casting causes internal voids to become sub-surface voids, which in turn causes premature fracture. In the region which is close to the fracture initiation site, extremely flat areas covered with fine fatigue striations can be easily observed. However, numerous randomly oriented serrated surfaces, indicative of rough fatigue crack growth were found near the regions farther away from the initiation site. Finally, the final fracture zone is characterized by a high level of porosity and dimples surrounding second phase particles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicAluminum Alloys Composites PropertiesFrench-language works237,207