RpmA Is Required for Nonopsonic Phagocytosis of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes severe respiratory tract infections in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). We have been examining nonopsonic phagocytosis of P. aeruginosa by macrophages. To study the P. aeruginosa-macrophage interaction at the molecular level, we have constructed a transposon Tn5G bank in a clinical isolate of P. aeruginosa (strain 4020) and identified mutants resistant to nonopsonic phagocytosis. Phagocytosis-resistant mutants were enriched by passaging the transposon bank over 18 macrophage monolayers. Of 900 individual mutants isolated from this enriched pool in a nonopsonic phagocytosis assay, we identified 85 putative mutants that were resistant to phagocytosis. In this study, we have characterized one of these transposon mutants, P. aeruginosa 4020 H27A, which was poorly ingested. H27A possessed a Tn5G insertion in a gene encoding a protein with homology to the MotA proteins of several species of bacteria. We have called this gene rpmA for required for phagocytosis by macrophages. RpmA is one of two MotA paralogs in P. aeruginosa. This rpmA::Tn5G mutant was motile both on agar plates and in visual examination of wet mounts. The phagocytosis defect was partially complemented by providing the rpmA gene in trans and fully complemented when both rpmA and rpmB were provided. A rpmA null mutant was ingested by macrophages similar to the H27A transposon mutant. These data suggest that the rpmA and rpmB gene products are required for the efficient ingestion of P. aeruginosa by macrophages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".