Speaker diarization of French broadcast news
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report results on speaker diarization of French broadcast news and talk shows on current affairs. This speaker diarization process is a multistage segmentation and clustering system. One of the stages is agglomerative clustering using state-of-the-art speaker identification methods (SID). For the QMMs used in this stage, we tried many different feature parameters, including MFCCs, Gaussianized MFCCs, Gaussianized MFCCs with cepstral mean subtraction, and Gaussianized MFCCs with cepstral mean substraction containing only frames with high energy. We found that this last set of feature parameters gave the best results. Compared to Gaussianized MFCCs, these features reduced the diarization error rate (DER) by 12% on a development set and by 19% on a test set. We also combined clusters resulting from Gaussianized and non-Gaussianized feature sets. This cluster combination resulted in another 4% reduction in DER for both the development and the test sets. The best DER we have achieved is 15.4% on the development set, and 14.5% on the test set.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it