Speaker diarization of French broadcast news
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report results on speaker diarization of French broadcast news and talk shows on current affairs. This speaker diarization process is a multistage segmentation and clustering system. One of the stages is agglomerative clustering using state-of-the-art speaker identification methods (SID). For the QMMs used in this stage, we tried many different feature parameters, including MFCCs, Gaussianized MFCCs, Gaussianized MFCCs with cepstral mean subtraction, and Gaussianized MFCCs with cepstral mean substraction containing only frames with high energy. We found that this last set of feature parameters gave the best results. Compared to Gaussianized MFCCs, these features reduced the diarization error rate (DER) by 12% on a development set and by 19% on a test set. We also combined clusters resulting from Gaussianized and non-Gaussianized feature sets. This cluster combination resulted in another 4% reduction in DER for both the development and the test sets. The best DER we have achieved is 15.4% on the development set, and 14.5% on the test set.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".