Effect of relative humidity during incubation at a set eggshell temperature and brooding temperature posthatch on embryonic mortality and chick quality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that RH during incubation of chicken eggs influences water loss from the egg and embryonic mortality. In those studies, eggshell temperatures (EST) were not monitored or controlled. Because RH influences the egg's heat loss through evaporation, EST might have been different between RH treatments, influencing embryonic mortality and development. To eliminate the effect of EST, in the current study eggs were incubated at an EST of 37.8°C from embryonic d (E) 0 until E18 and at a high (55 to 60%) or low (30 to 35%) RH from E2 until hatch. Embryonic mortality, hatch curve, and several chick quality characteristics (length, weight, navel quality, organ weights, and DM of the yolk free body mass and yolk) were determined on E18 and at hatch. Low RH increased egg weight loss between E0 and E18 (+3.0%) and third week embryonic mortality (+3.0% of fertile eggs) and decreased hatch of fertile eggs (-2.9% of fertile eggs) compared with high RH. Hatch duration and chick quality characteristics did not differ between RH treatments. To assess the effect of RH during incubation on posthatch performance under suboptimal conditions, hatchlings were brooded at a normal (35.0°C at d 0, decreasing to 27.0°C at d 4) or cold (27.8°C at d 0, decreasing to 25.6°C at d 4) temperature until 4 d posthatch. Incubation RH and brooding temperature significantly interacted with posthatch growth but not development. Both low and high RH × cold brooding temperature resulted in lower (-6.9 and -6.0 g, respectively) BW than high RH × normal brooding temperature at 4 d of age. The cold brooding temperature resulted in lower daily feed intake (-1.3 g/chick) than the normal brooding temperature. In conclusion, incubating eggs at a low RH compared with a high RH and maintaining the EST at 37.8°C decreased hatch of fertile eggs, but had little effect on chick quality or posthatch performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".