MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140091103 · doi:10.1139/t06-121

Submarine slope failure due to gas hydrate dissociation: a preliminary quantification

2007· article· en· W2140091103 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Mark F. Nixon, J LH Grozic

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsClathrate hydrateMethaneHydrateSubmarineDissociation (chemistry)Submarine pipelineSlope stabilityPore water pressureGeologyInstabilityGeotechnical engineeringChemistryMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gas hydrates are icelike compounds composed of water and methane gas in very compact form. There is substantial evidence from case histories that links gas hydrate dissociation to submarine slope failures and other geohazards. Theoretical analyses have also shown that upon dissociation gas hydrates will cause an increase in fluid pressure and a reduction in effective stress and thus result in loss of the soil strength. This paper presents a preliminary quantification of the effects of gas hydrate dissociation through development of a pore-pressure model that was incorporated into one- and two-dimensional slope stability analyses. The ensuing numerical study investigated submarine slope stability through parametric studies and application to two important case histories and found that dissociation of even small amounts of hydrate can have a significant destabilizing effect. Yet whether gas hydrate dissociation can alone cause large-scale slope failures has still to be demonstrated as there are often many destabilizing processes; however, this research highlights the importance of assessing the effects of gas hydrate dissociation on the behaviour of submarine slopes.Key words: gas hydrates, slope stability, marine, offshore, methane gas, instability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations190
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207