Production, Characterization and Assay Application of a Purified, Baculovirus-Expressed, Serogroup Specific Bluetongue Virus Antigen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The predominant serodiagnostic assay used in many countries to detect bluetongue virus (BTV) infections is a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (c-ELISA) which employs two critical reagents: a cell culture-derived BTV antigen and group-specific monoclonal antibody (Mab). Ongoing difficulties have been reported by laboratories in the production and quality control of the native antigen reagent which relies on the presence of adequate molar quantities and appropriate presentation of the major BTV core protein VP7. To address this important issue, a recombinant baculovirus was constructed containing a cDNA copy of genome segment 7 of BTV serotype 11 and used to infect insect cells which, in turn, expressed high levels of theVP7 protein with an estimated molecular mass of 39 kDa. In its purified form, this recombinant protein could be detected by group-specific Mabs designated 3.17.A3 and 8A3B.6 produced against BTV serotypes 1 and 17, respectively, as well as by polyclonal bovine antibodies raised against North American and South African BTV serotypes. No reactivity was observed by Western blot analysis with these two Mabs suggesting that the common antigenic determinants, on the BTV VP7 protein, were mainly conformational. It was interesting to note that the purified recombinant VP7 protein demonstrated a greater degree of reactivity with Mab 8A3B.6 compared to that exhibited with Mab 3.17.A3 when evaluated in an ELISA. Due to its antigenic similarity to the native antigen, the recombinant protein was found to be a suitable replacement for use in a c-ELISA to detect BTV-specific antibodies with the added advantage that it could be consistently produced and was, therefore, amenable to quality control testing for purity, stability and other standards.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".