MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung

2002· article· de· W2140166211 on OpenAlex
Gernot Sonneck

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWiener Medizinische Wochenschrift · 2002
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Medical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHealth promotionDisease preventionDiseasePrimary preventionDisease controlHealth educationHealth behaviorNursingEnvironmental healthPublic healthPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zusammenfassung: Gesundheit ist ebenso wie Krankheit kein statistischer Zustand, sondern ein dynamischer Prozeß, der unter anderem von inneren und äußeren Ressourcen, von Möglichkeiten, die dem einzelnen mitgegeben sind oder nicht, abhängig ist. Unter Gesundheitsverhalten verstehen wir all das, was der Einzelne dazu beiträgt, sein vorhandenes Gesundheitspotential zu fördern oder zu entwickeln. Dies schließt alle vorbeugenden Maßnahmen und Verhaltensweisen ein, die zur Verhütung oder frühen Erfassung einer Krankheit beitragen. Die Medizin ist traditionell auf das Erfassen von Krankheitsursachen und -prozessen ausgerichtet und hat jenes Verhalten, das primär gesundheitsförderlich ist, noch nicht in gleichem Maße untersucht. Das zeigt sich selbst am Präventionskonzept, das mit seiner primären Prävention, seiner sekundären (Behandlung) und tertiären (Rehabilitation) noch unmittelbar am Krankheitsmodell orientiert ist. Gesundheitsförderung jedoch zielt – wie in der Ottawa Charta 1986 festgelegt – auf einen Prozeß, allen Menschen ein höheres Maß an Selbstbestimmung über ihre Gesundheit zu ermöglichen und sie damit zur Stärkung ihrer Gesundheit zu befähigen. Aktives, gesundheitsförderndes Handeln geht somit weit in Politik und Lebenswelt hinein und umfaßt grundlegende Bedingungen wie Frieden, angemessene Wohnbedingung, Bildung, Ernährung, stabiles Ökosystem, sorgfältige Verwendung vorhandener Naturressourcen, soziale Gerechtigkeit und Chancengleichheit. Prevention and Health Promotion Summary: Health as well as illness is not a state but a dynamic process. It depends among others on internal and external resources and possibilities which are given or not. Health behavior means the contribution of the individual to foster and develop their health. This includes all measures and behavior which contribute to early prevention or detection of illness. Traditional medicine engages in the investigation of causes and processes of disease and has not yet investigated prevention or health promoting behavior in the same way. This can also be seen in the concept of primary, secondary and tertiary prevention, which is disease oriented. Health promotion however – as stated in the Ottawa Charta in 1986 is the process of enabling people to increase control over and to improve their health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it