The use of signature sequences in different proteins to determine the relative branching order of bacterial divisions: evidence that Fibrobacter diverged at a similar time to Chlamydia and the Cytophaga–Flavobacterium–Bacteroides division The GenBank accession numbers for the sequences reported in this paper are AY017380, AY017381, AY017382 and AY017383.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phylogenetic placement of the rumen bacterium Fibrobacter succinogenes was determined using a signature sequence approach that allows determination of the relative branching order of the major divisions among Bacteria [Gupta, R. S. (2000) FEMS Microbiol Rev 24, 367-402]. For this purpose, segments of the Hsp60 (groEL), Hsp70 (dnaK), CTP synthase and alanyl-tRNA synthetase genes, which are known to contain signature sequences that are useful for phylogenetic deterministic purposes, were cloned. Using degenerate oligonucleotide primers for highly conserved regions in these proteins, 1.4 kb, 0.75 kb, 401 bp and 171 bp fragments of the Hsp70, Hsp60, CTP synthase and alanyl-tRNA synthetase genes respectively were amplified by PCR, and these fragments were cloned and sequenced. These primers, because of their high degree of conservation, could also be used for cloning these genes from other bacterial species. The Hsp70 homologues from different Gram-negative bacteria contain a 21-23 aa insert that is not found in any Gram-positive bacteria. The presence of this insert in the F. succinogenes Hsp70 supports its placement within the Gram-negative group of bacteria. A conserved insert in F. succinogenes Hsp60 that is commonly present in all bacterial species, except various Gram-positive bacteria, Deinococcus-Thermus groups and green non-sulphur bacteria, provides evidence that F. succinogenes does not belong to these taxa. A particularly useful signature consisting of a 4 aa insert is found in Ala-tRNA synthetase. This insert is present in all proteobacterial homologues as well as in homologues from species belonging to the Chlamydia and Cytophaga-Flavobacterium- Bacteroides (CFB) groups, but it is not found in homologues from any other groups of bacteria. The presence of this insert in F. succinogenes Ala-tRNA synthetase provides evidence that this species is related to these groups. However, two other signatures in CTP synthase and Hsp70 proteins, that are distinctive of the proteobacterial species, are not present in the F. succinogenes homologues. These results provide evidence that F. succinogenes does not belong to the proteobacterial division and thus should be placed in a similar position as the Chlamydia and CFB groups of species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".