Fabrication of monolithic multilevel high-aspect-ratio ferromagnetic devices
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a process to fabricate monolithic multilevel high-aspect-ratio microstructures (HARMs) for ferromagnetic devices built on silicon wafers using aligned X-ray lithography in conjunction with electrodeposition. Two X-ray masks were fabricated, each consisting of gold (Au) absorber structures on a transparent polyimide membrane. One mask was used to print a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resist layer. Then, a second PMMA layer was applied to the same wafer, and the second mask was used to pattern it. Transparent alignment windows in the second mask, combined with a piezoelectrically controlled X-ray aligner, allowed for high alignment accuracy between the two print patterns over large areas (>4 inch in diameter). Au circuits were electroplated into first PMMA layer from a sulfite-based electrolyte, and nickel-iron (NiFe) ferromagnetic HARMs were formed in second PMMA resist from a sulfate-based bath. The deposition resulted in well-defined NiFe structures with aspect-ratios up to 67:1 as well as smooth sidewalls and top surfaces. Chemical composition measurements with energy X-ray dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and wavelength X-ray dispersive spectroscopy (WDS) showed that Fe content increased during the electrodeposition process. To electrically isolate the NiFe posts and Au circuits, both wet chemical etching and sputter etching were explored to remove the exposed seed layer, and the latter approach completely removed the seed layers without damaging the electroplated features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it