MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140235017 · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307554

Atrial fibrillation and stroke after atrial septal defect closure. Is earlier closure warranted?

2015· editorial· en· W2140235017 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sing‐Chien Yap

Bibliographic record

VenueHeart · 2015
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyAtrial fibrillationInternal medicinePopulationVolume overloadDuctus arteriosusRegurgitation (circulation)Heart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atrial septal defects (ASDs) are the most common congenital cardiac abnormalities in adults. Patients frequently present with symptoms for the first time at adult age. One of the most common late complications of an ASD is the development of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs), especially atrial fibrillation (AF). In a large population-based study from Ontario, the prevalence of AT was 19% in adult patients with ASD, which is fourfold higher than that in the general population.1 The incidence of AT continues to increase with age.2 ,3 This vulnerability to AT is not surprising considering the long-standing haemodynamic derangements due to left-to-right shunting causing atrial stretch, RV dilatation, elevated pulmonary arterial pressure and atrioventricular valve regurgitation. The resultant atrial electrical remodelling with increased dispersion of atrial refractoriness may predispose to AT. Furthermore, in surgically corrected patients, the presence of patches and suture lines may create the substrate for macroreentry AT. The current guidelines recommend closure of an ASD when there are signs of RV volume overload (in the absence of pulmonary hypertension) or if there is a suspicion of paradoxical embolism. In earlier studies, the prevalence of prior AT at the time of surgical closure at adult age is approximately 20%.2 ,3 ASD closure is associated with reduction in right atrial and ventricular volume and an increase in RVEF. However, atrial electrical and structural remodelling …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.005
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeartSame topicCardiovascular and Diving-Related ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207