MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140265393 · doi:10.3382/ps.2008-00402

Evaluation of glycerol removal techniques, cryoprotectants, and insemination methods for cryopreserving rooster sperm with implications of regeneration of breed or line or both

2009· article· en· W2140265393 on OpenAlex
Phillip H. Purdy, Y. Song, F.G. Silversides, Harvey D. Blackburn

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoultry Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCryoprotectantSpermRoosterCryopreservationAndrologySemenGlycerolExtenderBiologySperm motilityArtificial inseminationSemen cryopreservationAnimal scienceChemistryAnatomyBiochemistryEmbryoMedicineCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of experiments was designed to evaluate the quality of cryopreserved rooster sperm and its fertility so that programs needing to bank germplasm and recreate animals can do so utilizing a minimal amount of cryopreserved semen. In experiment 1, rooster semen from the National Animal Germplasm Program genebank was thawed and glycerol was removed using a discontinuous Accudenz column or by stepwise dilution. The postthaw sperm motilities, plasma membrane integrity, and concentration were determined before and after deglycerolization. Line differences in postthaw sperm concentration and progressive motility were observed before deglycerolization (P<0.05). After glycerol removal, the sperm that was centrifuged through Accudenz had greater total motility (37 vs. 33% sperm; P<0.05), but use of the stepwise dilution method recovered more sperm per milliliter (320.4x10(6)) compared with the Accudenz method (239.2x10(6) sperm; P<0.05; range across 6 lines of 165.7 to 581.0x10(6) sperm/mL). In experiment 2, rooster semen was cryopreserved using Lake's diluent containing either dimethyl acetamide (DMA) or glycerol as the cryoprotectants. Postthaw analysis revealed that the samples cryopreserved with glycerol survived freezing better, determined by total motility (47.8 and 15.1% glycerol and DMA samples, respectively; P<0.05) and annexin V analyses (1.6 and 11.3% membrane-damaged sperm for glycerol and DMA samples, respectively; P<0.05). Differences in sperm motilities (total and progressive motility) and velocities (path velocity, straight-line velocity, curvilinear velocity) were observed between the 2 cryoprotectant treatments once the glycerol had been removed from those samples cryopreserved with glycerol, of which the glycerol samples had significantly more motile sperm and higher velocities (P<0.05). The fertility of the samples frozen using the 2 cryoprotectants was tested using a single insemination (intravaginal or intramagnal) of 200x10(6) sperm and the fertility (number of live embryos) was evaluated over 18 d. Overall, the intravaginal inseminations had lower fertility than the intramagnal inseminations (P<0.05). In the intravaginal inseminations, the sperm cryopreserved using DMA resulted in lower fertility, but there were no differences in fertility in the intramagnal inseminations due to cryoprotectant (P>0.05). These results indicate that reasonable postthaw sperm quality and fertility can be derived using cryopreserved rooster semen. By utilizing this information, estimations can be made for storing sufficient material for line or breed, or both, recreation programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.239
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it