MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140335806 · doi:10.1109/epec.2009.5420968

A Dynamic Voltage Regulator compensation scheme for a grid connected village electricity hybrid wind/tidal energy conversion scheme

2009· article· en· W2140335806 on OpenAlexaff
T. Aboul-Seoud, Adel M. Sharaf

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyWind powerController (irrigation)Control theory (sociology)GridCompensation (psychology)TurbineComputer scienceElectricityWind speedPower (physics)VoltageAutomotive engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)MeteorologyMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Renewable energy can act as a sufficient and economic source of electrical energy in rural villages. In spite of being cheap, clean and abundant, the continuous fluctuations in the renewable energy sources causes significant power quality issues. Although the presence of a weak grid improves the rural village power quality, the presence of a FACTS device can introduce a significant improvement to the power quality of such a network. This paper studies a network presenting a rural load, such as a small village, fed from a wind turbine and a tidal turbine connected to a weak grid. The effect of the variation in wind speed and tides on the power quality is illustrated via simulation. The introduction of the Dynamic Voltage Regulator (DVR) to the network establishes a significant improvement to the power quality. The proposed DVR is a cheap and robust FACTS based device. It is controlled via a tri-loop dynamic error-driven PI controller. This scheme proved its ability to introduce a significant improvement which is illustrated via comparing the simulation results of the studied network with and without the DVR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207