MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140339721 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2010.5683483

An Efficient TDMA Scheme with Dynamic Slot Assignment in Clustered Wireless Sensor Networks

2010· article· en· W2140339721 on OpenAlexaff
Shafiq U. Hashmi, Jahangir H. Sarker, Hussein T. Mouftah, Nicolas D. Georganas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTime division multiple accessComputer scienceComputer networkWireless sensor networkChannel (broadcasting)Node (physics)Energy consumptionMarkov processReal-time computingChannel allocation schemesWirelessEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present an efficient MAC layer scheme using Dynamic Slot Assignment (DSA) in TDMA-based MAC protocols for cluster-based wireless sensor networks. The DSA scheme is presented to analyze the energy efficiency and channel utilization in a bursty traffic environment under low traffic conditions with a large number of sensor nodes in a single cluster. The DSA scheme will allow the network to adapt to the changing traffic load. Based on the network activity, the connection is established between the cluster-head node and those sensor nodes which have data to send, and a TDMA slot is assigned to each of them dynamically. We present the complete system model and model the data traffic by a correlated stochastic process (i.e. Markov chain) for a network where the second and subsequent connection arrival rate is dependent on the first arrival rate. We numerically compare our DSA with a traditionally proposed static TDMA model, the BMA model, and a variant of the BMA model (EA-TDMA), and prove substantial improvement in the energy consumption and channel utilization in low activity sensor networks. Results show that the efficiency of the MAC protocol can be increased significantly using the presented model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207