Unchanged fasting and postprandial adiponectin levels following a 4‐day caloric restriction in young healthy men
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Adiponectin is an adipocyte-secreted protein that has been shown to promote fat oxidation and insulin sensitivity in animals. Whether acute energy restriction is associated with modulation of adiponectin in humans remains largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a short-term caloric restriction on fasting and postprandial adiponectin levels in young healthy men. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifteen young healthy men were subjected to a 4-day energy restricted diet (-800 kcal/day). Before and after the intervention, anthropometric measurements, fasting and postprandial glucose, insulin and adiponectin were measured at 0, 30 and 60 min after a fixed breakfast. RESULTS: While fat mass remained stable, minor but significant changes in weight were observed after the 4-day energy-restricted diet. Glucose and insulin levels increased postprandially, and patterns did not differ before and after the intervention. Fasting levels of adiponectin remained unchanged after the energy restriction, and postprandial levels were not significantly different from fasting levels either before, or after, the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Fasting and postprandial adiponectin levels are not acutely modulated by a short-term energy restriction in young healthy men.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".