MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The introduction of the European bitterling (<i>Rhodeus amarus</i>) to west and central Europe

2007· article· en· W2140414461 on OpenAlexaff
Dirk Van Damme, N.G. Bogutskaya, Richard C. Hoffmann, Carl Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueFish and Fisheries · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRange (aeronautics)CarpPeriod (music)Abundance (ecology)EcologyBiologyGeographyFisheryZoologyFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The European bitterling is considered to be a native species over much of its present range in Europe. A dramatic decline in its abundance from 1960 to 1980 in west and central Europe, attributed to aquatic pollution, led to the establishment of stringent national and international regulations for protection of the species. Here, we review the evidence that until AD 1100 the bitterling was restricted to the Ponto‐Caspian and Aegean regions (south‐eastern Europe and adjacent regions of Asia Minor) and only expanded into its present range during the 19th century. The earliest records of bitterling in west and central Europe are from regions where carp cultivation was common and the bitterling appears to have spread into this region in association with the gradual expansion of carp cultivation. After an initial period of expansion, between approximately 1150 and 1560 in regions with carp cultivation, the species virtually disappeared from Europe during the coldest period of the Little Ice Age. Bitterling reappeared at the end of the 18th century, initially in historical centres of carp cultivation, and was again abundant and widespread in Europe by around 1850. Its reappearance appears to have been through expansion of refuge populations as well as new invasions. The decline in abundance of bitterling during the period 1960–80 in west and central Europe appears not only to have been caused by pollution, as is generally believed, but may also be correlated with low spring temperatures. From approximately 1980 onwards the European bitterling once again expanded its distribution in many parts of Europe, particularly in eastern Europe. This recent expansion may be due to a combination of factors, including a rise in ambient temperature coupled with an increase in anthropogenic dispersal and changes to aquatic habitats favourable to bitterling. Thus, the bitterling, which is legally protected in Europe at a national and international level as an endangered indigenous species, is actually an invasive species and a parasite of freshwater mussels. Its current expansion in distribution could pose a hazard to freshwater mussel populations in regions where they are already threatened.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFish and FisheriesSame topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207