MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140416388 · doi:10.1109/aps.1996.549750

Large electromagnetic scattering computation using iterative progressive numerical method

2002· article· en· W2140416388 on OpenAlexaff
Qiubo Ye, L. Shafai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIterative methodComputationIntegral equationScatteringCylinderIterative and incremental developmentMoment (physics)Matrix (chemical analysis)Electromagnetic fieldMethod of moments (probability theory)Mathematical analysisPhysicsMathematicsComputer scienceAlgorithmOpticsGeometryClassical mechanicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The progressive numerical method (PNM) is an effective way of dealing with electromagnetic scattering by electrically large objects. The PNM is based on the moment methods (MM). It is known that the solutions of the electric or magnetic field integral equations, using the MM, can be reduced to a matrix equation. The process of the PNM is started by selecting a small region at the centre of the illuminated side of the scatterer to reduce the interactions from the remaining sections of the object. However it is usually difficult to do so for asymmetrical scatterers. It is also noted that the accuracy of the solutions for the TE case is poorer than that of the TM case. This is due to the fact that for the TE case the induced currents are circumferential. An iterative step is incorporated with the PNM for better accuracy. To examine the behavior of the solution using iterative PNM, a perfect conducting infinite rectangular cylinder (TM case) is assumed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207