Image-guided Intervention in Management of Complications of Portal Hypertension: More than TIPS for Success
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Management of clinically important sequelae of portal hypertension, such as variceal bleeding and ascites, may involve a combination of medical, endoscopic, surgical, and interventional approaches and procedures. Although clinically significant esophageal and rectal varices are typically visible endoscopically, ectopic varices may require multiplanar portal venous phase computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis. A detailed understanding of individual vascular anatomy, flow dynamics, and patient-related factors such as cardiac and hepatic status is necessary for appropriate treatment selection in patients with complicated portal hypertension. The hepatic venous pressure gradient is the key indirect measurement of portal venous pressure. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement is regarded as the archetypal intervention for treating complicated portal hypertension by reducing portal pressure. Various modifications, such as direct portocaval shunt, may be used in patients with challenging vascular anatomy. A subset of patients with obstructed hepatic venous outflow or portal venous inflow should be considered for recanalization. Splenic artery embolization may be considered for reduction of portal pressure in selected patients, particularly when hypersplenism or splenic vein occlusion is a prominent feature. Gastric and ectopic varices may bleed even when the portal pressure is low, and balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) in such patients may lead to equal or improved outcome compared with TIPS placement. BRTO is not limited by poor hepatic reserve or encephalopathy; however, it does not reduce portal pressure and may aggravate esophageal varices. Interventional radiology plays an important role in maintaining the patency of surgically created portosystemic shunts, and it remains at the forefront of new approaches in shunt design and placement. Supplemental material available at http://radiographics.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/rg.335125166/-/DC1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".