Genome-wide mapping of modifier chromosomal loci for human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a disease of mutant sarcomeric proteins (except for phenocopy). Cardiac hypertrophy is the clinical diagnostic hallmark of HCM and a major determinant of morbidity and mortality in various cardiovascular diseases. However, there is remarkable variability in expression of hypertrophy, even among HCM patients with identical causal mutations. We hypothesized modifier genes are partly responsible for the variation in hypertrophic expressivity. To map the modifier loci, we typed 811 short-tandem repeat markers ( approximately 5 cMdense) in 100 members of an HCM family including 36 with the InsG791 mutation in MYBPC3. We performed oligogenic simultaneous segregation and linkage analyses using Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods and detected linkage on 3q26.2 (180 cM), 10p13 (41 cM), 17q24 (108 cM) with log of the posterior placement probability ratio (LOP) of 3.51, 4.86 and 4.17, respectively, and suggestive linkage (LOP of 2.40) on 16q12.2 (73 cM). The effect sizes varied according to the modifier locus, age and sex. It ranged from approximately 8 g shift in left ventricular mass for 10p13 locus heterozygosity for the common allele to approximately 90 g shift for 3q26.2 locus homozygosity for the uncommon allele. Refining the 10p13 locus restricted the candidate modifier genes to ITGA8, C10orf97 (CARP) and PTER. ITGA8 and CARP are biologically plausible candidates as they are implicated in cardiac fibrosis and apoptosis, respectively. Since cardiac hypertrophy is a major determinant of total and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, regardless of the etiology, identification of the specific modifier genes could have significant prognostic and therapeutic implications for various cardiovascular diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".