Inability Of Agrobacterium Tumefaciens Ribosomes To Translate In Vivo Mrnas Containing Non-Shine-Dalgarno Translational Initiators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerous data accumulated during the last decade have shown that the Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence is not a unique initiator of translation for Escherichia coli. Several other sequences, mostly of viral origin, have demonstrated their capability of either enhancing or initiating translation in vivo. A phage T7 gene 10 sequence, called "epsilon" (epsilon), has shown its high enhancing activity on translation in both Escherichia coli and Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells. In this study the epsilon, together with three other nucleotide sequences derived from the 5' non-translated regions of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), papaya mosaic virus (PMV) and clover yellow mosaic virus (CYMV) RNAs are tested for translation initiation activity in A. tumefaciens cells. The obtained results indicate that none of them was capable of initiating translation in vivo of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) mRNA. To determine whether their inactivity was related with structural differences in the ribosomal protein S1, the rpsA gene (coding for S1 protein in E. coli) was co-expressed in A. tumefaciens together with the cat gene placed under the translational control of the above sequences. Our results showed that the rpsA gene product did not make any of the four viral enhancers active in A. tumefaciens cells. The inability of A. tumefaciens ribosomes to translate mRNAs devoid of SD sequences indicates for a substantial difference in the ribosome structure of the two Gram negative bacteria E. coli and A. tumefaciens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".