SHIP-deficient, alternatively activated macrophages protect mice during DSS-induced colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
mϕ are heterogeneous in their functions, and although it is clear that inflammatory mϕ contribute to inflammation in IBDs, multiple lines of evidence suggest that M2a mϕ may offer protection during intestinal inflammation. In vivo SHIP-deficient mouse mϕ are M2a so SHIP-deficient mice provide a unique genetic model of M2a mϕ. Based on this, this study tested the hypothesis that SHIP-deficient, M2a mϕ protect mice from intestinal inflammation. The objectives were to compare the susceptibility of SHIP+/+ and SHIP-/- littermates with DSS-induced intestinal inflammation and to determine whether protection was mϕ-mediated and whether protection could be transferred to a susceptible host. We have found that SHIP-/- mice are protected during DSS-induced intestinal inflammation. SHIP-/- mice have delayed rectal bleeding and reduced weight loss, disruption of intestinal architecture, and immune cell infiltration during DSS-induced colitis relative to their WT littermates. Using liposome depletion of mϕ, we found that SHIP-/- mouse protection was indeed mϕ-mediated. Finally, we determined that SHIP-/- mϕ-mediated protection could be conferred to susceptible WT mice by adoptive transfer of M2a mϕ derived ex vivo. This study supports our hypothesis by demonstrating that SHIP-deficient, M2a mϕ are protective in this murine model of acute intestinal inflammation. Adoptive transfer of M2a mϕ to patients with IBDs offers a promising, new strategy for treatment that may be particularly useful in patients who are otherwise refractory to conventional therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".