Central venous catheter‐related thrombosis presenting as superior vena cava syndrome in a haemophilic patient with inhibitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the case of a 10.5-year-old boy with severe haemophilia A (SHA) and inhibitors who presented with superior vena cava (SVC) obstruction while on immune tolerance induction (ITI) with daily recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) and factor eight bypassing activity (FEIBA) (75 U kg(-1)) twice a week. The boy had a right-sided implanted central venous catheter. Imaging revealed a large occlusive thrombus in the SVC with all upper venous system drainage occurring through the azygos and collateral veins. Despite initial success with local thrombolytic therapy using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, the thrombus persisted. Mechanical thrombolysis and angioplasty resulted in the successful removal of the thrombus and resolution of the SVC syndrome. Unfractionated heparin was used to prevent thrombus reformation/propagation. A work-up did not reveal any underlying genetic prothrombotic risk factors. The occurrence of such a profoundly symptomatic thromboembolism (TE) in a boy with SHA with inhibitors is unusual. A combination of risk factors, including the ongoing infusion of high doses of FVIII in the context of a disappearance of inhibitors together with the infusion of clotting factors known to be potentially thrombogenic, may place haemophilic patients on ITI (immune tolerance induction) at risk for this rare, life-threatening complication. The appropriate management of TEs in such a setting is unknown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".