Molecular Theory of Solvation and Electrical Double Layer in Nanoporous Carbon Electrodes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrical double layer (EDL) in a nanoporous electrode is very different from a planar electrochemical capacitor. The statistical-mechanical, Replica RISM-KH-VM molecular theory for electrolyte solution sorbed in disordered nanoporous materials provides full microscopic details of the solvation structure and thermodynamics and electrochemical properties averaged over the thermal motion of sorbed solution and over quenched morphology of host nanoporous material. The method reveals the molecular mechanisms and driving forces of sorption of electrolyte solution in a nanoporous carbon electrode which are drastically different from the electrical double layer in electrolyte solution at a planar electrode. These include nanoporous confinement morphology and external charge, size and chemical specificities of solvent and electrolyte, osmotic forces, the internal EDL at the surface of nanopores and the external EDL at the contact with bulk solution. The interplay of these factors determines the efficiency of an electrosorption cell and the specific capacitance of the electrochemical supercapacitor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".