Arterial baroreflex function in older adults with neurocardiogenic syncope
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Neurocardiogenic syncope (formerly vasovagal) accounts for large numbers of falls in older adults and the mechanisms are poorly understood. This study examined the differences in baseline arterial baroreflex function in older adults with and without a neruocardiovascular response to orthostatic stress. METHODS: Subjects were divided into two groups based on the presence (TT+ group) or absence (TT- group) of a neurocardiovascular response to upright tilting (70 degree head-up tilt for 10 minutes after 400 micrograms of sublingual nitroglycerin). A neurocardiovascular response was defined as presyncopal symptoms (lightheadedness) in association with at least a 30 mm Hg decrease in blood pressure. Before being divided into groups, baroreflex function was assessed using the spontaneous baroreflex method (baroreflex sensitivity, BRS). This method involves the analysis of "spontaneous" swings in blood pressure and heart rate that are mediated by the arterial baroreflexes. RESULTS: 42 older adults (mean age 70.3+/-0.7 yr) were recruited, of which 18 were in the TT+ and 24 were in the TT- group. At baseline, the TT+ group demonstrated increased arterial baroreflex sensitivity in response to negative blood pressure sequences only (BRSdown, 11.2+/-1.9 vs. 7.3+/-1.0 ms/mm Hg, P=0.011). During tilt, the TT+ group demonstrated a much larger decrease in overall arterial baroreflex sensitivity than the TT- group (-6.8+/-1.2 vs. -3.2+/-0.9 ms/mm Hg, P=0.012). There was a negative correlation between BRSdown and length of tilt table test (r=-0.329, P=0.041) in the TT+ subjects. CONCLUSION: Older adults with neurocardiogenic syncope have exaggerated arterial baroreflex sensitivity at baseline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".