Clusters in the adsorbates of vapours and gases: Zeta isotherm approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A procedure for determining the structure of vapour and gas adsorbates that is based on the Zeta adsorption isotherm is reported. For vapours and for gases, this isotherm supposes that an adsorbate consists of particle clusters with the number of particles in a cluster denoted ζ, where ζ can be 1, 2, 3… up to a maximum of ζm, and predicts the isotherm constants are independent of pressure. For vapours, this allows the isotherm constants to be determined from isotherm measurements made at pressures less than the saturation-vapour pressure, Ps, but applied at pressures greater than Ps. Since ζ has an upper limit, we show that there are no singularities in the vapour or gas adsorption isotherms for any pressure. This allows the adsorption of vapours at pressures greater than Ps to be investigated: clusters with ζm molecules are predicted to increase in number as P(V) is increased, until they form an adsorbed film with each adsorption site occupied by a ζm-cluster. We apply the same procedure to determine the value of ζm for gas adsorption. For CO adsorbing on Ni(100), ζm is predicted to be unity for all the cases considered, indicating that the adsorbate consists of adsorbed molecules without any clustering. For H2 adsorption on the three different materials, ζm is found to be two: indicating the adsorbate consists of both adsorbed molecules and atoms. For each material considered, a pressure is predicted where the mole fractions of both are equal, and at higher pressure, the mole fraction of adsorbed molecules exceeds that of the adsorbed atoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".