Liens et chaînons manquants dans le processus d’utilisation de la recherche. Utilisation accrue grâce aux méthodes de recherche et développement (Traduction de René Auclair)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Après une introduction de base portant sur la R-D sociale, Jack Rothman propose dans son article un modèle de recherche et développement des services d'aide aux personnes. Pour ce faire, il présente d'abord le contexte et l'environnement de la R-D. À l'aide d'une recherche documentaire il se réfère ensuite aux connaissances en sciences sociales, puis formule les concepts dans une perspective de recherche appliquée. Il conçoit les études pilotes et conduit les études sur le terrain. Il produit la R-D proprement dite; il la diffuse et la met en marché, tout en créant les structures et les ressources nécessaires aux centres de R-D sociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.089 | 0.129 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.023 | 0.029 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".