Tracking Endocardial Motion Via Multiple Model Filtering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tracking heart motion plays an essential role in the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases. As such, accurate characterization of dynamic behavior of the left ventricle (LV) is essential in order to enhance the performance of motion estimation. However, a single Markovian model is not sufficient due to the substantial variability in typical heart motion. Moreover, dynamics of an abnormal heart could be very different from that of a normal heart. This study introduces a tracking approach based on multiple models, each matched to a different phase of the LV motion. First, the algorithm adopts a graph cut distribution matching method to tackle the problem of segmenting LV cavity from cardiac MR images, which is acknowledged as a difficult problem because of low contrast and photometric similarities between the heart wall and papillary muscles within the LV cavity. Second, interacting multiple model (IMM), an effective estimation algorithm for Markovian switching system, is devised subsequent to the segmentations to yield state estimates of the endocardial boundary points. The IMM also yields the model probability indicating the model that most closely matches the LV motion. The proposed method is evaluated quantitatively by comparison with independent manual segmentations over 2280 images acquired from 20 subjects, which demonstrated competitive results in comparisons with related recent methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".