The caudal neurosecretory system: control and function of a novel neuroendocrine system in fish
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The caudal neurosecretory system (CNSS) of fish was first defined over 70 years ago yet despite much investigation, a clear physiological role has yet to be elucidated. Although the CNSS structure is as yet thought to be confined to piscine species, the secreted peptides, urotensins I and II (UI and UII), have been detected in a number of vertebrate species, most recently illustrated by the isolation of UII in humans. The apparent importance of these peptides, suggested by their relative phylogenetic conservation, is further supported by the complex control mechanisms associated with their secretion. The CNSS in teleosts is known to receive extensive and diverse innervation from the higher central nervous system, with evidence for the presence of cholinergic, noradrenergic, serotonergic, and peptidergic descending inputs. Recent observations also suggest the presence of glucocorticoid receptors in the flounder CNSS, supporting previous evidence for a possible role as a pituitary-independent mechanism controlling cortisol secretion. The most convincing evidence as to a physiological role for the CNSS in fish has stemmed from the direct and indirect influence of the urotensins on osmoregulatory function. Recent advances allowing the measurement of circulating levels of UII in the flounder have supported this. In addition, there is evidence to suggest some seasonal variation in peptide levels supporting the notion that the CNSS may have an integrative role in the control of coordinated changes in the reproductive, osmoregulatory and nutritional systems of migratory euryhaline species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it