MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140614297

ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMENGARUHI PERSISTENSI LABA

2015· article· id· W2140614297 on OpenAlex
Btari Mutia Anggraeni

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ilmiah Universitas Bakrie · 2015
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Governance and Financial Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness administrationNonprobability samplingStock exchangeBusinessLeverage (statistics)Cash flowEarningsMathematicsAccountingPopulationStatisticsFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan menemukan bukti empiris mengenai pengaruh volatilitas arus kas, tingkat utang, siklus operasi dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap persistensi laba. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan pertambangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) selama periode 2012-2014. Total sampel adalah 10 perusahaan. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan metode purposive sampling.Analisis penelitian ini menggunakan regresi berganda. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa tingkat utang dan ukuran perusahaan berpengaruh positif terhadap persistensi laba sedangkan volatilitas arus kas dan siklus operasi berpengaruh negatif terhadap persistensi laba. Keywords : volatilitas arus kas, tingkat utang, siklus operasi, ukuran perusahaan, persistensi laba This research is aimed to examine and find out empirical evidence of the influence of cash flow volatility, leverage, operating cycle, and firm size on earnings persistence. Samples used in this research are mining copanies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) during period 2002 – 2004. Total samples are 10 companies.The data are collected using purposive sampling method. The analysis of this research employs multiple regression. Results show that leverage and firm size have positive effect on earnings persistence, but cash flow and operating cycle have negative effect on earnings persistence. Keywords : cash flow volatility, leverage, operating cycle, firm size, earnings persistence DAFTAR PUSTAKA Andrianto, M. (2009). Pengaruh Earning management dan Corporate Governance Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan : Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di BEI [skripsi]. Solo: Universitas Sebelas Maret. Ayres, F.L. (1994). Perception of Earnings Quality: What Managers Need to Know. Management Accounting, 75 (9), 27-29 Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Joumal of Accounting & Economics, 24, 3–37. Belkaoui, A, R. (2000). Teori Akuntansi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Creswell, John W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, Second Edition . California: Sage Publication Dechow, P., & Dichev. (2002). The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors. The Accounting Review, 77 (Supplement), 35-59. Fanani, Z.  (2008). Kualitas Pelaporan Keuangan : Faktor-Faktor Penentu Dan Konsekuensi Ekonomiya. The 2nd Accounting Conference, 1st Doctoral Colloquium, and Accounting Workshop . Depok: Universitas Indonesia. Fanani, Z. (2010). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penentu Persistensi Laba. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia , 109-123 . Firmansyah. (2006). Analisis Volatilitas Harga Kopi Internasional. Jakarta : Usahawan. Ghozali, I. (2010). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Harahap, S. (2002). Akuntansi Aktiva Tetap. Bumi Aksara: Jakarta Hayati, O. (2014). Pengaruh Volatilitas Arus Kas Dan Tingkat Hutang Terhadap Persistensi Laba [skripsi]. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang. Hayn, C. (1995). The Information Content of Losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20, 125-153. Melani, A. (2014). Harga Emas Turun, Laba Antam Terkikis 86%. Diakses dari http://bisnis.liputan6.com/read/2018537/harga-emas-turun-laba-antam-terkikis-86 [ 5 Maret 2014]. Nuraini, M. (2014). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penentu Persistensi Laba [skripsi]. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro. Octavia, S. (2004).  Analisa siklus operasi terhadap likuiditas operasi pada perusahaan makanan dan minuman yang listing di Bursa Efek Jakarta [skripsi]. Jakarta: Universitas Kristen Petra. Pasopati, G. (2015). Laba Usaha Perusahaan Tambang Bakrie Anjlok 66.27 Persen. Diakses dari  http://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20150119133004-92-25648/laba-usaha-perusahaan-tambang-bakrie-anjlok-6627-persen/ [19 Januari 2015]. Penman, S.H. (2003). Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation. Second Editon: McGraw Hill. Phan, Philip H., & Yoshikawa, T. (2000). Agency theory and Japanese corporate governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. 17, 1-27. Purnamasari, D. (2014) . Analisis Kinerja Modal Intelektual, Tingkat Pengungkapan Modal Intelektual dan Performa Klub Sepakbola Eropa [skripsi]. Depok: Universitas Indonesia. Purwanti, T. (2010). Analisis Pengaruh Volatilitas Arus Kas, Besarana Akrual, Volatilitas Penjualan, Leverage, Siklus Operasi, Ukuran Perusahaan, Umur Perusahaan, dan Likuiditas Terhadap Kualitas Laba [thesis]. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret. Rachmat, D. (2013). Laba Emiten Tambang Anjlok 30% di 2012. Diakses dari http://finance.detik.com/read/2013/03/30/164850/2207350/6/laba-emiten-tambang-anjlok-30-di-2012 [30 Maret 2013]. Richardson, S. (2003). Earnings Quality and Short Sellers. Supplement. Accounting Horizons, 17, 49-61. Samisi, K.,  & Ardiana. (2013). Pengaruh Struktur Pendanaan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Kepemilikan Manajerial Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana , 451-469. Schipper, K. (2004). Cost Of Equity And Earnings Attributes. The Accounting Review , 79, 976-1010. Scott, W. R. (2000). Financial Accounting Theory, 2nd Ed. Ontario: Prentice-Hall Canada. Setiana, E., & Rahayu. (2012).  Analisis Pengaruh Struktur Modal Terhadap Kinerja Pada Perusahaan Otomotif Yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2008 – 2010. Jurnal Telaah Akuntansi Uniersitas Negeri Medan , 13, 33-50. Sinaga, H. H. (2010). Analisis Pengaruh Total Arus Kas, Komponen Arus Kas, Laba Akuntansi Terhadap Return Saham [skripsi]. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro. Sloan, R.G. (1996). Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flow About Future Earnings?. The Accounting Review, 71 (3), 289-315. Sunarto. (2008). Peran Persistensi Laba Memperlemah Hubungan Antara Earning Opacity Dengan Cost of Equity Dan Trading Volume Activity [disertasi]. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro. Suwandika, I.M. (2013). Pengaruh Perbedaan Laba Akuntansi, Laba Fiskal, Tingkat Hutang Pada Persistensi Laba. Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana , 196-214. Tucker, J. W., & Zarowin. (2006). Does income smoothing improve earnings informativeness?  The Accounting Review 81 , 251-270. Tumirin. (2003). Analisis Variabel Akuntansi Kuartalan, Variabel Pasar, Arus Kas Operasi Yang Mempengaruhi Bid-Ask Spread [thesis]. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yustiana, H. 2011. Analisis Pengaruh Variabel Moderating (Company Size dan Financial Leverage) Terhadap Hubungan CSR Disclosure dan Financial Performance (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di BEI 2008-2009) [skripsi]. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it