Chronic Tension Type Headache and the Impact of Myofascial Trigger Point Release in the Short Term Relief of Headache
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated the effect of myofascial release in relieving the symptoms of Chronic TensionType Headache (CTTH) Methods: The study used a convenience sampling pretest-post test design. 31 people (7men and 24 women, age range 18-58 years, mean age 32 years) with CTTH participated in the study. The headachesample was screened for MTrP in the cranial and pericranial muscles and was treated with myofascial releasetherapy. The outcomes were measured in terms of the number of headache days in a week and the headache painlevel measured in visual analog scale (VAS). Analysis: The analysis was done using paired ‘t’ test at 95%confidence interval Results: The study showed significant improvements in reduction of the number of headachedays (p < 0.001) and the headache pain level (p < 0.001) following treatment. Conclusion and Implications:Myofascial release therapy to the trigger points in people with CTTH has a positive influence in decreasing painintensity and frequency in CTTH sufferers. In future, during management of CTTH screening for myofascialtrigger points and concomitant treatment using myofascial release could be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".