Polymeric micellar paclitaxel phosphorylates Bcl-2 and induces apoptotic regression of androgen-independent LNCaP prostate tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel has been difficult to evaluate in preclinical tumor model systems because its poor solubility requires a Cremophor EL formulation, which results in lethal anaphylaxis. We tested the effectiveness of a novel polymeric micellar paclitaxel on androgen-independent tumor growth in the LNCaP tumor model. METHODS: Athymic male mice bearing LNCaP tumors were castrated and allowed to grow until their PSA levels increased to three times above precastration levels. The animals were then treated with 0.5 mg intravenous polymeric micellar paclitaxel once daily for the first 5 days of a 3-week cycle. In total, three cycles were given. Tumor volume and serum PSA levels were measured weekly to monitor tumor progression. RESULTS: In vitro mitogenic assays demonstrated that polymeric micellar paclitaxel was effective in inhibiting LNCaP cell growth with an IC(50) of 5 nM. Paclitaxel precipitated apoptosis in vitro at a concentration of 1 nm and higher, confirmed by DNA laddering. Western blotting demonstrated that paclitaxel treatment phosphorylated and inactivated Bcl-2. In mice bearing LNCaP tumors treated with micellar paclitaxel, tumors regressed rapidly with the commencement of micellar paclitaxel treatment. Tumor size decreased 91% and PSA level decreased 96% after three cycles of treatment. TUNEL immunostaining of the tumor treated with micellar paclitaxel showed marked apoptosis when compared with the control. No significant side effects or mortality was observed in the micellar paclitaxel group (n = 7). In contrast, all (n = 7) mice treated with conventional Cremophor EL paclitaxel died within 1 day of injection. CONCLUSIONS: The polymeric micellar paclitaxel formulation is water-soluble and capable of inducing complete response in mice bearing androgen-independent LNCaP tumors. The lack of toxicity of polymeric micellar paclitaxel permits in vivo preclinical testing of paclitaxel-based combination regimens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".