MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Follow-up Study of the First Successful Living Donor Islet Transplantation

2006· article· en· W2140969460 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Shinichi Matsumoto, Teru Okitsu, Yasuhiro Iwanaga, Hirofumi Noguchi, Hideo Nagata, Yukihide Yonekawa, Xiaoling Liu, Hiroki Kamiya, Michiko Ueda, N Hatanaka, Naoya Kobayashi, Yuichiro Yamada, Shuichi Miyakawa, Yutaka Seino, A. M. James Shapiro, Kōichi Tanaka

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsMedicineIsletTransplantationDiabetes mellitusGlycemicSurgeryInsulinInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Islet transplantation has become an option for the treatment of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and is usually performed using brain-dead heartbeating donors. However, we have very limited number of such donors in Japan; therefore, it is not allowed to perform islet transplantation with brain-dead donors. In order to perform islet transplantation in Japan, we need to seek new donor resources. METHODS: We performed the first successful living-donor islet transplantation. In this case, the recipient had brittle diabetes with hypoglycemic unawareness. The donor was deemed qualified after undergoing both metabolic and preoperative assessments. Distal pancreatectomy was performed using open laparotomy and more than 400,000 islets were isolated and transplanted immediately. RESULTS: The recipient has been insulin independent posttransplant with positive C-peptide for more than one year. She no longer suffers from hypoglycemic unawareness and displayed a substantial improvement in hemoglobulin (Hb) A1C. The donor's clinical course was uneventful, which allowed her to return to her job within one month. She maintained normal fasting C-peptide and HbA1C levels during follow-up period. CONCLUSION: In our first case of living donor islet transplantation, both the donor and the recipient have been maintaining excellent glycemic control with no untreatable complications for more than one year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207