MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2140979341 · doi:10.1111/bph.12480

Differential interactions of antiretroviral agents with <scp>LXR</scp>, <scp>ER</scp> and <scp>GR</scp> nuclear receptors: potential contributing factors to adverse events

2013· article· en· W2140979341 on OpenAlexaff
Jenny Svärd, Fernando Blanco, Daniel K. Nevin, Darren Fayne, F Mulcahy, Martina Hennessy, Paul Spiers

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Pharmacology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersHigher Education Authority
KeywordsPregnane X receptorNuclear receptorConstitutive androstane receptorReceptorLiver X receptorEfavirenzAllosteric regulationChemistryIn silicoCell biologyBiologyPharmacologyBiochemistryImmunologyTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antiretroviral (ARV) drugs activate pregnane X receptors and constitutive androstane receptors, increasing the risk of drug interactions due to altered drug metabolism and disposition. The closely related liver X receptors (LXRα/β), oestrogen receptors (ERα/β) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) regulate many endogenous processes such as lipid/cholesterol homeostasis, cellular differentiation and inflammation. However, ARV drug activation of these nuclear receptors has not been thoroughly investigated. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The ability of an ARV drug library to activate LXRα/β, ERα/β and GR was assessed using a combined in silico and in vitro approach encompassing computational docking and molecular descriptor filtering, cell-free time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer co-activator assays to assess direct binding to ligand-binding domains (LBDs), cell-based reporter assays and target gene expression. KEY RESULTS: Direct LBD interactions with LXRα and/or LXRβ were predicted in silico and confirmed in vitro for darunavir, efavirenz, flavopiridol, maraviroc and tipranavir. Likewise, efavirenz was also predicted and confirmed as a ligand of ERα-LBD. Interestingly, atazanavir and ritonavir also activated LXRα/β in reporter assays, while tipranavir enhanced transcriptional activity of ERα. Effects on ER and LXR target gene expression were confirmed for efavirenz and tipranavir. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: There was good agreement between in silico predictions and in vitro results. However, some nuclear receptor interactions identified in vitro were probably due to allosteric effects or nuclear receptor cross-talk, rather than direct LBD binding. This study indicates that some of the adverse effects associated with ARV use may be mediated through 'off-target' effects involving nuclear receptor activation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of PharmacologySame topicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentFrench-language works237,207