Bayesian association of haplotypes and non-genetic factors to regulatory and phenotypic variation in human populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: With the recent availability of large-scale data sets profiling single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and quantitative traits data across different human subpopulations, there has been much attention directed towards discovering patterns of genetic variation and their connection to gene regulation and the onset/progression of disease. While previous work has focused primarily on correlating individual SNP markers with gene expression and disease, it has been suggested that using haplotype blocks instead of individual markers can significantly increase statistical power. RESULTS: We present BlockMapper, a probabilistic generative model for genotype data and quantitative traits data, such as gene expression or phenotype measurements. BlockMapper discovers the block structure of genotype data and associates these inferred blocks to patterns of variation in quantitative traits data, whilst accounting for non-genetic factors. Our model achieves high accuracy for predicting Crohn's disease phenotype in Chromosome 5q31 and reveals novel cis-associations between two haplotype blocks in the ENm006 genomic region and GDI1, a gene implicated in X-linked mental retardation. Our results underscore the importance of accounting for the influence of large sets of SNPs on patterns of regulatory/phenotypic variation and represent a step towards an understanding of human genetic variation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".