Mapping of clubroot ( <i>Plasmodiophora brassicae</i> ) resistance in canola ( <i>Brassica napus</i> )
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clubroot disease, caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae , has become a major problem in the production of cruciferous crops worldwide. In this study, a population of 121 doubled haploid ( DH ) lines derived from a crossing between a resistant and a susceptible canola ( Brassica napus ) genotype was subjected to phenotypic and genotypic studies to determine the inheritance and location of the resistance gene(s). After inoculation with pathotype 3 of P. brassicae , the lines showed a 1:1 segregation ratio for resistance, indicating that resistance in this population is controlled by a single gene. Fifteen PCR ‐based markers that were known to be linked to clubroot resistance (CR) genes were screened against genomic DNA from parents and resistant and susceptible bulks. Marker GC1680, linked to the CR gene CRa , exhibited polymorphism between the parents and between the resistant and susceptible bulks. CRa target primers were used to amplify fragments from the two parents and the resultant sequences were compared. A high degree of sequence similarity was found between the parents in the nucleotide binding site domain of CRa . In contrast, sequence polymorphisms were detected in the leucine‐rich repeat ( LRR ) domain. One pair of primers that amplify a band from the LRR region of the resistant parent but not the susceptible parent was used to screen the DH population. Amplicons were obtained from 60 of the 61 resistant lines and two of the 60 susceptible lines; thus, three recombinants were found. Based on these results, a resistance locus linked to CRa was found.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".