Queuing Models for Dimensioning Interactive and Streaming Services in High-Speed Downlink Packet Access Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider modeling the statistical behavior of interactive and streaming traffics in high-speed downlink packet access (HSDPA) networks. Two important applications in these traffic categories are web-browsing (interactive service) and video streaming (streaming service). Web-browsing is characterized by its important sensitivity to delay. Video streaming on the other hand is less sensitive to delay, however, due to its large frame sizes, video traffic is more affected by the packet loss resulting from a limited buffer size at the base station. Taking these characteristics into account, we consider modeling the queuing delay probability density function (PDF) of the Web-browsing traffic, and modeling the queuing buffer size distribution of video streaming traffic. Specifically, we show that the queuing delay of the Web-browsing traffic follows an exponential distribution and that the queuing buffer size of video streaming traffic follows a weighted Weibull distribution. Model fitting based on simulated data is used to provide simple mathematical formulations for the different parameters that characterize the PDFs under consideration. The provided equations could be used, directly, in HSDPA network dimensioning and, as a reference, to satisfy a certain quality of service (QoS).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".