The Effects of Ingratiation on Employee Career Success
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In an organization, employees have to be especially witty to influence their superiors and gain compliance. Building a better working relationship with their superiors would guarantee lots of perquisites, such as promotion, easier interactions and bigger bonuses. According to scholars and researchers, use of appropriate upward influence strategies contributes to the smooth functioning of the organization and may also affect human resource decisions. Understanding upward influence is crucial because such behavior affects both individual and organizational effectiveness. It was presumed that a superior would allocate more rewards to an ingratiating subordinate. When the superior was potentially opened to influence, subordinates tried to impress him/her by presenting themselves to be strong and competent. Ingratiation tactic is believed to be employed by employees in organizations in order to obtain employers’ approval and receive favorable consequences. Enlightened by a plethora of researches on influence, this paper investigates the effects of subordinates' ingratiatory behaviors on their career success. Keywords: Ingratiation; Employees; Impression Management; Career Success; SubordinateResume: Dans une organisation, les employes doivent etre particulierement spirituels pour influencer leurs superieurs et obtenir leur agrement. Construire une meilleure relation de travail avec leurs superieurs pourraient leur garantir beaucoup d'avantages, tels que la promotion, des interactions plus faciles et des bonus plus importants. Selon les experts et les chercheurs, l'utilisation des strategies d'influence appropriees contribue au bon fonctionnement de l'organisation et peut egalement influer sur les decisions des ressources humaines. Comprendre cette influence est crucial, car un tel comportement affecte a la fois l'efficacite individuelle et l'efficacite organisationnelle. Il est presume que le superieur hierarchique serait allouer davantage de recompenses a un subordonne insinuant. Lorsque le superieur est potentiellement ouvert aux influences, des subordonnes tentent de l'impressionner en se presentant a etre forts et competents. La tactique de bonnes grâces est censee etre utilisee par les employes dans les organisations afin d'obtenir l'approbation de l'employeur et de recevoir des consequences favorables. Eclaire par une plethore de recherches sur l'influence, cet article etudie les effets des comportements insinuants des subordonnes sur leur reussite professionnelle.Mots-cles: flatteries; employes; gestion de l'impression; reussite professionnelle; subordonnes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".