MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141514500 · doi:10.1080/09540100400003550

Monoclonal antibodies for fumonisins B<sub>1</sub>, B<sub>2</sub>and B<sub>3</sub>

2003· article· en· W2141514500 on OpenAlexaff
Marc E. Savard, R.C. Sinha, Rhoda Lau, Charles Seguin, S. Buffam

Bibliographic record

VenueFood and Agricultural Immunology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsNational Association of Friendship Centres
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunogenChemistryKeyhole limpet hemocyaninFumonisin B1Monoclonal antibodyImmunoassayFumonisinAntibodyBovine serum albuminHemocyaninToxinChromatographyMycotoxinBiochemistryBiologyImmunologyFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been only one report of fumonisin antibodies produced from a fumonisin-bovine serum albumin (BSA) immunogen in the past. Other, more exoteric, carriers, such as cholera toxin and keyhole limpet hemocyanin, have also been used. The resulting antibodies have a wide range of sensitivity and selectivity for the most common fumonisins B1, B2 and B3. We report on fumonisin monoclonal antibodies produced in typical fashion from an immunogen consisting of FB1 conjugated to BSA through its terminal amino group. These antibodies have excellent cross-reactivity with the three main fumonisins: FB1, 100%, FB2, 94%, and FB3, 72%, adequate sensitivity with an IC50 of 430 ng/mL for FB1, and show excellent correlation between ELISA and total fumonisins as determined by HPLC, with a slope of 0.985 and an r2 of 0.987.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood and Agricultural ImmunologySame topicMycotoxins in Agriculture and FoodFrench-language works237,207