COMPETING FOR SKILLS: US IMMIGRATION POLICY SINCE 1990
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MMIGRATION policies are the mix of international, national, and local rules and programs that aim to facilitate the admission and integration of some foreigners and prevent the entry and stay of others.This article examines U.S. policies on legal immigration, with particular focus on the admission of highly skilled migrants.The United States is a nation of immigrants.Americans share a common experience: they or their forebears left another country to begin anew in the United States.Historically through the turn of the twentieth century, immigrant newcomers came in waves that reinforced the national origin of their forebears, and the government minimally regulated numbers or skills.That changed with legislation in the 1920s that introduced restrictions based on national origins, followed by slow post-World War II policy liberalization and the genesis of today's admission policies in the 1960s.Now policymakers debate the merits of admitting immigrants primarily for their family ties, which essentially reinforces national origin, compared with an emphasis on immigrants' skills.Immigration to the United States has been of such volume and diversity that there is an intrinsic acceptance, at times reluctantly, of the role immigrants from diverse places play in constructing the "American."Certainly, Canadians see themselves as a land of immigration, but the British and French enterprises in Canada displace immigration as the founding myth of the "Canadian" (Hawkins 1988:34).These national differences have contributed to different historical justifications for similar, exclusionary, admission policies.In either case, early U.S. and Canadian immigration or admission policies from the turn-of-the-century were explicitly linked to immigrant or integration policy.Exclusionary policies and restrictions on the number of immigrants were devised to address integration concerns.Significant changes ensued in the two decades following the Second World War.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it