MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141695130 · doi:10.1002/pd.1134

A fragile site at 10q23 (FRA10A) in a phenytoin-exposed fetus: a case report and review of the literature

2005· article· en· W2141695130 on OpenAlexaff
Chantal F. Morel, Alessandra M.V. Duncan, Valérie Désilets

Bibliographic record

VenuePrenatal Diagnosis · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenytoinFetusMedicineEpilepsyPregnancyGeneticsBiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To report fragility at 10q23.3 in a fetus exposed to phenytoin during pregnancy. Review of the literature. METHODS: Amniocytes were cultured in A10 (WISENT) culture medium. Molecular polymorphism studies of MTHFR gene using PCR were performed on fetal tissues. RESULTS: The fragile site was expressed in all 22 amniocyte colonies analyzed. Analysis of fetal blood showed 46,XX[98]/46,XX,fra(10)(q23.3)[3]/46,XX,del(10)(q23.3) [1]. Molecular studies of the MTHFR (methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase) gene identified a compound heterozygote genotype for two polymorphisms, 677C>T and 1298A>C. CONCLUSION: The fragility at 10q23.3 is unlikely to be due to culture condition-induced folic acid deficiency (medium contains folate). It is possible that this finding represents a previously undescribed folic acid-insensitive fragile site in the region of 10q23.3. Alternatively, the fetal cells may have had decreased folate metabolism, and the fragile site was the known folate-sensitive FRA10A. Since phenytoin has been shown to decrease MTHFR activity in mice, we postulate that the fragile site at 10q23.3 in this fetus may have arisen secondary to a combination of the polymorphisms in MTHFR and exposure to this drug, and is indeed FRA10A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrenatal DiagnosisSame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207