A fragile site at 10q23 (FRA10A) in a phenytoin-exposed fetus: a case report and review of the literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report fragility at 10q23.3 in a fetus exposed to phenytoin during pregnancy. Review of the literature. METHODS: Amniocytes were cultured in A10 (WISENT) culture medium. Molecular polymorphism studies of MTHFR gene using PCR were performed on fetal tissues. RESULTS: The fragile site was expressed in all 22 amniocyte colonies analyzed. Analysis of fetal blood showed 46,XX[98]/46,XX,fra(10)(q23.3)[3]/46,XX,del(10)(q23.3) [1]. Molecular studies of the MTHFR (methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase) gene identified a compound heterozygote genotype for two polymorphisms, 677C>T and 1298A>C. CONCLUSION: The fragility at 10q23.3 is unlikely to be due to culture condition-induced folic acid deficiency (medium contains folate). It is possible that this finding represents a previously undescribed folic acid-insensitive fragile site in the region of 10q23.3. Alternatively, the fetal cells may have had decreased folate metabolism, and the fragile site was the known folate-sensitive FRA10A. Since phenytoin has been shown to decrease MTHFR activity in mice, we postulate that the fragile site at 10q23.3 in this fetus may have arisen secondary to a combination of the polymorphisms in MTHFR and exposure to this drug, and is indeed FRA10A.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".