Relation between domain evolution, specificity, and taxonomy of the α‐amylase family members containing a C‐terminal starch‐binding domain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The alpha-amylase family (glycoside hydrolase family 13; GH 13) contains enzymes with approximately 30 specificities. Six types of enzyme from the family can possess a C-terminal starch-binding domain (SBD): alpha-amylase, maltotetraohydrolase, maltopentaohydrolase, maltogenic alpha-amylase, acarviose transferase, and cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase). Such enzymes are multidomain proteins and those that contain an SBD consist of four or five domains, the former enzymes being mainly hydrolases and the latter mainly transglycosidases. The individual domains are labelled A [the catalytic (beta/alpha)8-barrel], B, C, D and E (SBD), but D is lacking from the four-domain enzymes. Evolutionary trees were constructed for domains A, B, C and E and compared with the 'complete-sequence tree'. The trees for domains A and B and the complete-sequence tree were very similar and contain two main groups of enzymes, an amylase group and a CGTase group. The tree for domain C changed substantially, the separation between the amylase and CGTase groups being shortened, and a new border line being suggested to include the Klebsiella and Nostoc CGTases (both four-domain proteins) with the four-domain amylases. In the 'SBD tree' the border between hydrolases (mainly alpha-amylases) and transglycosidases (principally CGTases) was not readily defined, because maltogenic alpha-amylase, acarviose transferase, and the archaeal CGTase clustered together at a distance from the main CGTase cluster. Moreover the four-domain CGTases were rooted in the amylase group, reflecting sequence relationships for the SBD. It appears that with respect to the SBD, evolution in GH 13 shows a transition in the segment of the proteins C-terminal to the catalytic (beta/alpha)8-barrel(domain A).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".