MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2141846290 · doi:10.2337/diabetes.51.1.73

Oral Exposure to Diabetes-Promoting Food or Immunomodulators in Neonates Alters Gut Cytokines and Diabetes

2002· article· en· W2141846290 on OpenAlexafffund
Fraser W. Scott, Paul Rowsell, Gen‐Sheng Wang, Karolina Burghardt, Hubert Kolb, Stefanie B. Flohé

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaHealth Canada
FundersMedical Research Council CanadaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth CanadaMedical Research CouncilUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsDiabetes mellitusWeaningMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyType 2 diabetesType 1 diabetesImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disease development in diabetes-prone BB rats is modified by the type of diet fed after weaning. The aim of this investigation was to determine whether exposure during the first week of life to antigens from a known diabetes-promoting diet (NIH-07) could modify diabetes incidence and, if so, to what extent this occurs via alterations in systemic T-cell reactivity, gut cytokines, or islet infiltration. Diabetes-prone BB (BBdp) rats were hand-fed twice daily between age 4 and 7 days with vehicle, a hydrolyzed casein (HC)-based infant formula, Pregestimil (PG), PG + cereal-based NIH-07 diet, PG + lipopolysaccharides (LPS) or PG + LPS + silica. After weaning, they were fed either an NIH-07 diet or a semipurified HC (diabetes-retardant) diet until 150 days. In separate studies, 5-day-old BBdp rat pups were administered the aforementioned treatments, and expression of intestinal mRNA for gamma-interferon (IFN-gamma) or transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) was quantified using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. The effect of early oral treatment with NIH-07 or PG on systemic T-cell reactivity was evaluated using footpad swelling delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) and the popliteal lymph node assay. Oral exposure of neonates to a complex mixture of antigens from the diabetes-promoting diet delayed onset of diabetes (79 vs. 88 days) and prevented disease in approximately one-third of animals. A similar protective effect was seen for neonatal exposure to wheat gluten in animals subsequently weaned onto a semipurified wheat gluten diet. By contrast, LPS-treated neonates displayed more severe insulitis and developed diabetes at an increased rate, which was significantly suppressed by co-administration of silica particles. The protective effect of early exposure to diabetogenic diets was not associated with significant reduction of islet infiltration, and there was no impact on the DTH response to food antigens. However, whereas diabetes-resistant BBc rats developed systemic tolerance to NIH-07 antigens fed chronically, BBdp rats did not. The lack of effect of the early oral antigen regimen on the DTH reaction in the footpad, a classic Th1-mediated reaction, suggests little effect on systemic T-cell reactivity. However, local effects were observed in the small intestine. Oral exposure to diabetes-promoting food antigens or LPS downregulated the Th1 cytokine IFN-gamma and decreased the IFN-gamma/TGF-beta ratio. Thus, oral exposure to diabetes-promoting food antigens and immune modulators in neonates can modify diabetes expression in association with changes in local cytokine balance in the gut.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207